RD Withdrawal Interest – Clarification

For withdrawal made on or after – interest rate 1st January, 2005

2 per cent over and above the interest rate applicable to the deposits made for a period of five years under the POTD Rules, 1981, on the date of withdrawal. [MOF (DEA) Notification No. GSR. 838 (E) dated 27.12.2004].
In the case of repayment in one lump sum, interest at the rate specified in sub rule (3) shall be calculated on the amount of withdrawal for full calendar months from the month of withdrawal to the month of repayment irrespective of the date on which the amount is withdrawn or repaid. If the repayment with interest is made on or before the 10th of a month, no interest shall be payable for that month.

from Blogger http://www.systempost.in/2019/07/rd-withdrawal-interest-clarification.html

Clarification on Department of Posts Postman and Mail Guard (Group ‘C’) Recruitment Rules, 2018.

Clarification on Department of Posts Postman and Mail Guard (Group ‘C’) Recruitment Rules, 2018.





F.No. 03-03/2019-SPN-I
Ministry of Communications 
Department of Posts
Dak Bhawan, Sansad Marg, 
New Delhi – 110001
June 19, 2019
To,
1) All Chief Postmasters General/ Postmasters General
2) Chief General Manager, BD Directorate/ Parcel Directorate/ PLI Directorate
3) Director, RAKNPA I GM, CEPT I Directors of all PTCs
4) Addl. Director General, Army Postal Service, New Delhi
Subject: – Clarification on Department of Posts Postman and Mail Guard (Group ‘C’) Recruitment Rules, 2018.
Madam / Sir,
I am directed to refer to Department of Posts Postman and Mail Guard (Group ‘C’) Recruitment Rules (RRs), 2018 notified on 20.09.2018 which superseded Department of Posts (Postman and Mail Guard) Recruitment Rules, 2010. In this regard, a few Circles have sought clarification on certain points, which are clarified as under:-
1. Circle/ Issue – 
Andhra Pradesh, Haryana, Karnataka: Whether the educational and other qualifications (Knowledge of computer Language and possessing valid driving license of two-wheeler) required for direct recruits detailed in column 7 of RRs of Postman/Mail Guard is applicable for GDS candidates (direct recruitment).
Andhra Pradesh: Whether the candidates having two wheeler license only should be allowed for examination/ selection OR can license be obtained afterwards. 
Clarification 
Provisions of Column 7 of Postman/ Mail Guard RRs have been relaxed for existing GDS (who have been engaged prior to notification of new RRs) as per letter no. 03-02/2019-SPN-I dated 26.03.2019. Following relaxations have been provided to the GDS candidates:
a) GDS with 10th standard pass shall be allowed to appear in the competitive examination, if otherwise found fit;
b) GDS without license to drive two wheeler or light motor vehicle shall also be allowed to appear in the competitive examination. However, a candidate not having valid driving license at the time of appointment shall not earn periodical increment in pay till production of such license or for a period of five years from the date of appointment whichever is earlier and after production of such license or expiry of such five years period, pay shall be restored prospectively to the level pay would have reached had the periodical increment in pay was not withheld and no arrears of pay shall be paid for the intervening period.
2. Circle/ Issue 
Andhra Pradesh: Procedure to be followed for testing the knowledge of computer. 
Clarification
Syllabus and pattern of LDCE examination has been revised as per Directorate’s letter no. 17-08/2018- SPB-I dated 10.05.2019.
3. Circle/ Issue 
Andhra Pradesh: Keeping m view, work involved and time sensitivity for conducting separate examinations for filling the vacancies of Postman / Mailguard among both MTS and GDS, whether a common examination may be conducted for filling the postman / mailguard vacancies by both MTS and GDS. 
Clarification
A common examination may be held across the Circle for filling up of vacancies of Postman/ Mailguard from both MTS and GDS.
Seeking Option from Candidate
a.             At the time of inviting application for appearing in examination, candidates may be asked to exercise order of preference for Recruiting Units (All Divisions).

b.    The candidates belonging to postal divisions shall indicate order of preference for postal divisions excluding parent division (s) followed by RMS divisions.
 The candidates belonging to RMS divisions shall indicate order of preference for RMS divisions excluding parent division (s) followed by postal divisions.

d.    It should be clarified that candidates should exercise preference for all Recruiting Units for consideration. In case preference is exercised for a limited number of units and could not be allocated to one of those units as per merit vis a vis vacancy in the category he/ she belongs to, he/ she will not be considered for other recruiting units not preferred even though a candidate lower m rank to him/ her is considered who has opted for that unit.

Order of preference once exercised shall not be changed. Preparation of Merit List and allocation of Division


a.             At first, two merit lists for each division/recruiting unit shall be prepared for Qualified candidates
(i) One of MTS candidates, and
(ii) One of GDS candidates.

b.    Qualified candidates shall be allocated to their respective parent recruiting unit in the order of merit vis a vis category in which selected vis a vis availability of vacancy in the respective category (for the purpose of vertical I horizontal reservation).

c.     After allocation of candidates to their respective Parent Unit (Postal Divisions I RMS Divisions), four separate merit lists for the entire Circle shall be prepared for all such candidates who could not be adjusted/ allocated against their Parent Unit (s), viz.
(i) MTS of all Postal divisions
(ii) MTS of all RMS divisions
(iii) GDS of all Postal divisions
(iv) GDS of all RMS divisions
 A reserve category candidate selected against an unreserved vacancy on •own merit shall have choice to migrate to reserve category if by doing so he/she can be allocated to a Unit, which is higher in the order of preference exercised by him/her. Therefore, an undertaking to this effect shall be included m the application for appearing m examination.

Publication of Results

The Circle shall publish separate results for both Postman and Mailguard.


a) Postman: Division wise lists of candidates in order of merit who have been allocated to parent unit followed by list of surplus qualified candidates, who were not allocated to Parent Unit/ Division and allocated to other Recruiting Units/Divisions based on merit, shall be published for each division.

b) Mailguard: Division wise lists of candidates in order of merit who have been allocated to parent unit followed by list of surplus qualified candidates, who were not allocated to Parent Unit I Division and allocated to other Recruiting Units/Divisions based on merit, shall be published for each division.


4. Circle/ Issue 

Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka: The revised syllabi and pattern for LDCE for the cadre of Postman I Mailguard as per the educational qualification I.e. 12th standard, prescribed m the Revised Recruitment Rules of Postman I Mail Guard, 2018.

Clarification: 

Syllabus and pattern of LDCE examination has been revised as per Directorate’s letter no. 17-08/2018- SPB-I dated 10.05.2019.


5. Circle/ Issue 

Andhra Pradesh: Whether the DR vacancies of the year 2017-18 can be offered to GDS surplus qualified candidates as per the provisions of New RRs under Rules 10(iii)(b) & (c) OR these vacancies can be included in the vacancy position of 2018 to fill up as per new Recruitment Rules.

North East: Whether vacancy of Postman to be calculated from 01.04.2018 to date of publication of above said Gazette as per old RRs or as per new RRs. 

Telangana : Whether the DR vacancies of the year 2017-18 can be offered to GDS surplus qualified candidates as per the prov1s10ns of New RRs under Rules 10(iii)(b) & (c) OR these vacancies can be filled up by issuing open notification as per old Recruitment Rules.

Clarification: 

O.M No. AB.14017/13/2013-Estt.(RR)(1349) of Department of Personnel & Training (DOPT) states as under:-

“The legal position is that the posts are to be filled up as per – the eligibility conditions prescribed in the Recruitment Rules in force at the time of occurrence of vacancies unless the Recruitment Rules are amended retrospectively. The practice has however been to give effect to the Recruitment Rules prospectively.”Further, clarification has already been issued vide letter number 37-10/2002-SPB-I dt. 14.11.2002 which states as follows-

“According to cannons of la w, the recruitment rules in force at the time of occurrence of vacancies whatsoever be the date of notification, should be followed. “ 

Accordingly , vacancies upto the vacancy year 2017 (April 2017 . March 2018) are required to be filled up as per the Postman and Mailguard, Recruitment Rules, 2010, and vacancies occurring in 2018 vacancy year (April – December 2018) and thereafter are required to be filled up as per Recruitment Rules of 2018 notified on 20.09.2018.

6. Circle/ Issue 

Haryana: As per old RRs of Postman/Mail Guard, 2010 service conditions for GDS is five years of regular service m the grade as on 1st April of the year. But in new RRs of PMJM:G, 2018, nothing has been mentioned about the service condition for GDS to apply for the post of PMJM:G.

Clarification: 

Point No. (iii) under column 10 of the Schedule of Department of Posts (Postman and Mailguard) Recruitment Rules, 2018 may be referred to in this regard. Only those GDS who have worked regularly for five years in that capacity as on the 1st day of January of the year to which the vacancy (ies) belongs are eligible.

7. Circle/ Issue 

Rajasthan Circle: In the RRs of Postman and Mail Guard, it is mentioned that age and educational qualifications prescribed for direct recruits will not apply in the case of promotees. However, there is no mention about the other qualifications in the column no. 8 of RRs as mentioned in column no. 7.

Clarification: 

 Observations of the Circle have been noted. Amendment of Department of Posts Postman and Mail Guard (Group ‘C’) Recruitment Rules (RRs), 2018 to this extent is under consideration.

Till further revision of RRs, other qualifications may not be made applicable for considering promotion.

8. Circle/ Issue 

Karnataka Circle: To provide SOP for departmental examination.

Clarification: 

SOP for Departmental Examinations is under process.

2. The above clarifications may be brought to the notice of all concerned and action taken to conduct DPC/Examination for promotion/appointment to the cadre of Postman/ Mail Guard at the earliest.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(Muthuraman C)

Assistant Director General (SPN)

Source: [https://ift.tt/2XCsCFz]

from Blogger http://www.systempost.in/2019/07/clarification-on-department-of-posts.html

Withholding of increment for six months – Regulation of Pay in 7th CPC Pay Matrix: Illustrations

Regulation of Pay on Reduction of lower stage in time-scale of pay in 7th CPC Pay Matrix: Examples & Illustrations


[Annexure to DoPT OM No.11012/15/2016-Estt A-III dated 18-06-2019 Subject: Regulation of pay on imposition of a penalty under CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965]
Withholding of increment for six months – Regulation of Pay : Case History No. 4

Case History No. 4

(iv) Case 4: Withholding of increment [Penalty under 11(iv)]

The penalty of Withholding of one increment for a period of six months is imposed on a Government servant on 13.08.2017. The Government servant is drawing Rs.50500 in Level 7 of Pay Matrix. Pay would be fixed on following manner:
When the date of Increment is 1st January
When the date of Increment is 1st July
Pay when Penalty imposed
Rs. 50500 [5th Cell of Level 7]
Rs. 50500 [5th Cell of Level 7]
Pay during the currency period
The increment due on 01.01.2018 will be withheld  i.e. upto 30.06.2018.
As such, the pay w.e.f. 13.08.2017 to 30.06.2018 = Rs. 50500 [5th Cell of Level 7]
The increment due on  01.07.2018 will be withheld  i.e. upto 31.12.2018.
As such, the pay w.e.f.  13.08.2017 to 31.12.2018 = Rs. 50500 [5th Cell of Level 7]
Increment (notional)
On 1st January, 2018
Rs. 52000 [6th Cell of Level 7]
On 1st July, 2018
Rs. 52000 [6th Cell of Level 7]
Pay after the currency period
 w.e.f 1.07.2018 =  Rs. 52000 [6th Cell of Level 7]
[w.e.f. 01.01.2019 i.e. date of  next increment, the pay will be Rs. 53600 (7th Cell of Level 7).
w.e.f 1.1.2019 =  Rs. 52000 [6th Cell of Level 7]
[w.e.f. 01.07.2019 i.e. date of  next increment, the pay will be  Rs. 53600 (7th Cell of Level 7).
Currency Period
13.08.2017 to 30.06.2018
13.08.2017 to 31.12.2018

from Blogger http://www.systempost.in/2019/06/withholding-of-increment-for-six-months.html

Reduction with cumulative effect to a lower stage by two stages – Regulation of Pay in 7th CPC Pay Matrix: Illustrations

Reduction with cumulative effect to a lower stage by two stages  – Regulation of Pay in 7th CPC Pay Matrix: Illustrations


[Annexure to DoPT OM No.11012/15/2016-Estt A-III dated 18-06-2019 Subject: Regulation of pay on imposition of a penalty under CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965]
Reduction with cumulative effect to a lower stage by two stages  – Regulation of Pay : Case History No. 7
Case History No. 7

(vii) Case 7: Reduction to a lower stage with cumulative effect [penalty under Rule 11(v)]

The penalty of reduction to a lower stage by two stages in the time-scale of pay for a period of one year is imposed on a Government servant w.e.f. 13.08.2017. It is further directed that the Government servant would not earn increment during the period and the reduction will have the effect of postponing future increments of pay. The Government servant is drawing Rs. 50500 in Level 7 of Pay Matrix. Pay would be fixed on following manner:
When the date of Increment is 1st January
When the date of increment is 1st July
Pay when Penalty imposed
Rs. 50500 [5th Cell of Level 7]
 Rs. 50500 [5th Cell of Level 7]
Reduced Pay w.e.f. 13.08.2017
 Rs. 47600 [3rd Cell of Level 7]
 Rs. 47600 [3rd Cell of Level 7]
Pay during the currency period
Pay w.e.f. 13.08.2017 to 12.08.2018 will be Rs. 47600 [3rd Cell of Level 7]
 Pay w.e.f. 13.08.2017 to 12.08.2018 will be Rs. 47600 [3rd Cell of Level 7]
Increment(notional)
No increment during the period of penalty
No increment during the period of penalty
Pay on completion of penalty as on 13.08.2018
Since future increment is to Pay on be postponed to adversely completion of affect his pension. no penalty as on increment will be given on the 13.08.2018 pre- penalty pay and on restoration pay will remain same as Rs. 50500 (5th Cell Cell of Level 7]
Since future increment is to be  postponed to adversely affect his pension, no increment will be given on the pre- penalty pay and on restoration pay will remain same as Rs.50500 (5th Cell of Level 7]
Next increment
Next increment will be due w.e.f. 01.01.2019 raising his pay to Rs. 52000 (6th Cell of Level 7]
Next increment will be due  w.e.f. 01.07.2019 raising his 
pay to Rs. 52000 (5th Cell of Level 7)

from Blogger http://www.systempost.in/2019/06/reduction-with-cumulative-effect-to.html

Penalty of reduction to lower time-scale of pay/ grade – Regulation of pay in 7th CPC Pay Matrix: Illustrations

Penalty of reduction to lower time-scale of pay/ grade – Regulation of pay  in 7th CPC Pay Matrix: Illustrations


[Annexure to DoPT OM No.11012/15/2016-Estt A-III dated 18-06-2019 Subject: Regulation of pay on imposition of a penalty under CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965]
Penalty of reduction to lower time-scale of pay/ grade – Regulation of pay : Case History No. 8

Case History No. 8

(viii) Case 8: Reduction to lower time-scale of pay/ grade

The penalty of reduction to the lower grade carrying Level 8 for a period of two years is imposed on Government servant who is at Level 9 w.e.f. 04.11.2018. with further directions that the reduction shall not postpone his future increments and on the expiry of the period he shall regain his original seniority in the higher grade.
On 4.11.2018, the Government servant is drawing Rs. 58000 in Level 9 of Pay Matrix. The Government servant had been promoted from the post in Level 8 to the post in Level 9 of the Pay Matrix on 13.08.2016 and on promotion his pay was fixed at Rs. 54700/-. At the time of promotion his pay was Rs.52000 in Level 8 of the Pay Matrix.

In this case the pay in Level 8 would need to be fixed w.e.f. 4.11.2018 to 3.11.2020 as if he had continued in Level 8. Pay would be regulated as under:
Date
Level 9
Level 8
13.08.2016
54700 [2nd Cell in Level 9]
52000 [4th Cell in Level 8]@
1.07.2017
56300 [3rd Cell in Level 9]
53600 [5th Cell in Level 8]@
1.07.2018
58000 [4th Cell in Level 9]
55200 [6th Cell in Level 8]@
3.11.2018
58000 [4th Cell in Level 9]
4.11.2018
[date of penalty order]
55200 [6th Cell in Level 8] [after imposition of penalty]
Pay during the currency period from 4.11.2018 to 3.11.2020
i.            Reduced pay w.e.f. 4.11.2018 to 30.06.2019 will be 55200 [6th Cell in Level 8]
ii.            Pay w.e.f. 1.07.2019 to 30.06.2010 will be Rs. 56900/- [7th Cell in Level 8]
iii.            Pay w.e.f. 1.07.2020 to 3.11.2020 will be Rs. 58600 [8th Cell in Level 8]
Notional pay during the currency period
On 1st July, 2019 Rs.59700 [5th Cell in Level 9]
On 1st July, 2020 Rs. 61500 [6th Cell in Level 9]
4.11.2020 [After completion of penalty]
61500 [6th Cell in Level 9]
Next Increment 1.7.2021
63300 [7th Cell in Level 9]

NOTE:

1. @Notional pay in Level 8 from 13.08.2016 to 3.11.2018.

2. Under FR-28. the authority which orders the reduction of a Government servant as a penalty from a higher grade or post to a lower grade or post may allow him to draw pay at any stage, not exceeding the maximum of the lower grade or post, which it may think proper. Provided the pay allowed to be drawn by a government servant shall not exceed the pay which he would have drawn by the operation of FR 22 read with clause (b) or (c), as the case may be of FR 26. This illustration is where no such orders have been passed. Where the disciplinary authority has specified the pay to be drawn in the lower post pay will be drawn as per those directions.

from Blogger http://www.systempost.in/2019/06/penalty-of-reduction-to-lower-time.html

7th CPC Bunching of Pay – Point of doubts and Clarification

7th CPC Bunching of Pay – Point of doubts and Clarification



7th CPC Bunching of Pay – Point of doubts and Clarification – Finmin Ordrs issued on 
7.2.2019

Points of doubt raised and clarifications thereon
SL. NO
POINT OF DOUBT
CLARIFICATION
1.
Whether one increment of 3% constitute one stage or a difference of 3% among the pay of two officers
As explained in this Ministry’s earlier OM dated 3.8.2017, the stages of every pay scale were well defined in the pay structure under 5th CPC regime and the stages were not well defined in the 6th CPC structure. Since there were no defined stages in the 6th CPC structure and as pay in the running Pay Band in the 6th CPC structure could be of any amount in the multiple of Rs. 10, as specific to an employee, it has been very clearly brought out therein, drawing upon the illustration given by the 7th Pay Commission in para 5.1.37 of its Report . that a difference of at least 3%, the rate of annual increment in the 6th CPC structure, was essential for counting of two stages. Therefore, for the purpose of considering bunching, two Pays drawn in a Pay Band with a particular Grade Pay, which are separated by 3% of the lower pay; are to be taken into account, as explained in the illustration given in para 9(i) of this order.
2.
Whether the pay at Cell 1 of any Level may be taken as first stage.
Bunching is to be considered with reference to the consecutive stages of pay drawn in the pay structure obtaining prior to 1.1.2016, as explained in these orders and as such a reference to Cell 1. which is in the revised pay structure, is not relevant.
3.
Whether all .pay stages lower than the entry pay in the 6th CPC pay structure the purpose of bunching.
This point has been amply clarified in the aforesaid OM dated 3.8.2017.  As mentioned in para 8(iv) thereof , all pay stages lower than the Entry Pay in the 6th CPC pay structure as indicated in the Pay Matrix contained in 7th CPC Report are not to be taken into account for determining the extent of bunching.
4.
Whether benefit of bunching should be given only where previous and current pay stages of the officers (specific to each employee) are getting bunched and placed at the same Level in the 7th CPC matrix without any comparison to any other officer’s pay as per para 5 and 8(iii) of this Department’s OM dated 3.8.2017 which stipulates that a difference of 3% to be reckoned for determination of consecutive pay stages, specific to each employee.
The position clarified in these orders covers this poi nt. As explained in the illustration. the pre-revised pay of Rs.46,100 and Rs.47,490 are considered two stages of pay, as these are separated by 3% and these could be drawn by any two officers.
5.
Whether benefit of bunching is to be given to a senior officer with reference to the pay of his junior officer who is drawing less pay with the difference of 3% to the senior officer and now his pay got fixed in the same Level as that of the senior officer.
The issue of bunching is not a matter of pay drawn by a Senior Officer vis-a-vis a Junior Officer. As explained in these orders, bunching happens as in the illustration given in these orders and as such this is not related to the issue of seniority.
6.
Whether the benefit of bunching is also required to be given to a senior officer where his junior’s pay has got fixed in the same Cell as that of the senior due to the benefit of bunching of pay given to the junior
7.
Whether the benefit of bunching may be extended on account of bunching of two stages of pre-revised pay of a Government servant alone.
It is not clear how two stages drawn by a single Government servant are relevant for pay fixation on 1.1.2016, as only the pay drawn on 31.12.2015 is to be taken into account for pay fixation on 1.1.2016
8.
Whether the benefit of bunching may be extended only on direct pay fixation where the pay of two officers in the pre-revised pay with a difference of 3% get fixed at the same stage in the revised pay structure (7th CPC) or also on further bunching with next higher pay stage due to grant of additional increment to an officer for bunching on initial/direct pay fixation.
As explained in the illustration contained in para 9(ii) of these orders, no such benefit is admissible in such cases.

from Blogger http://www.systempost.in/2019/02/7th-cpc-bunching-of-pay-point-of-doubts.html